SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Damaris Wanthi Musyoka v Hussein Dairy Ltd & another [2012] KEHC 2514 (KLR)

[2012] KEHC 2514 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
2514
Citation
[2012] KEHC 2514 (KLR)
Decided
30 August 2012
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypePersonal InjuryPostureAppeal from a judgment of the High Court of Kenya, MombasaCoramM. K. Ibrahim, J.W. Mwera
Holding

The court finds the plaintiff entitled to the relief sought in the plaint, including general damages, pain and suffering, and loss of amenities. The court awards Kshs. 1,364,000 in general damages.

Facts

The plaintiff, Damaris Wanthi Musyoka, was involved in a road accident on 24th February 1999. She was injured and treated at Voi and Pandya Hospitals. She sought damages for general damages, loss of future earnings, and costs and interest.

Issues

  1. Quantum of damages
  2. Consistency of income

Reasoning

The court considers the plaintiff's inconsistent income claims and awards a minimum statutory wage of Kshs. 12,000 per month for future earnings. It also awards Kshs. 250,000 for pain and suffering and Kshs. 250,000 for loss of amenities.

Outcome

Judgment for the plaintiff against the defendant for 100% liability and Kshs. 1,364,000 in general damages.

Orders

  • Special damages of Kshs. 138,280 with interest from date of filing suit
  • Witness expenses of Kshs. 3,000
  • General damages of Kshs. 1,364,000 with interest from date of judgment
  • Costs of the suit

Remedies

  • General damages of Kshs. 1,364,000 with interest from date of judgment
  • Special damages of Kshs. 138,280 with interest from date of filing suit

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Minimum statutory wage
Cases cited (1)
  • Michael Njenga Kimani v Stephen Njoroge Kimani and Anor. HCCC No. 4495 of 1986 (Unreported)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case