SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

RAKAI CLEARING & FORWARDING LTD V PRIME BANK LIMITED [2012] KEHC 2809 (KLR)

[2012] KEHC 2809 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
2809
Citation
[2012] KEHC 2809 (KLR)
Decided
26 July 2012
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil SuitPostureDefendant seeks to strike out the plaint and dismiss the suit with costs.CoramHon. R.M. Mwongo, R. Mwadime
Holding

The court dismisses the application to strike out the plaint and dismiss the suit with costs, but orders the parties to file and serve their bundles of documents and list of issues within 30 days. If the plaintiff defaults, the plaint shall be struck out.

Facts

The plaintiff filed a suit seeking an injunction to preserve motor vehicles and an order for a proper taking of account to determine the amount due on an overdraft account. The court granted an injunction and ordered the sale of the vehicles, but only one vehicle was sold. The plaintiff and defendant agreed to appoint an independent auditor to resolve the issue of interest.

Issues

  1. Whether the plaintiff's second prayer is a reasonable cause of action.
  2. Whether the plaintiff's suit is frivolous, vexatious, without merit, or an abuse of the court process.

Reasoning

The court finds that the plaintiff's second prayer is not frivolous or without merit and has some chance of success. The court also notes the plaintiff's dilatory behavior in prosecuting the claim.

Outcome

Defendant's application dismissed with costs to the plaintiff.

Orders

  • Order the parties to file and serve their bundles of documents and list of issues within 30 days.
  • Order the parties to take a hearing date.
  • Order the plaint to be struck out if the plaintiff defaults.

Authorities cited

Cases cited (1)
  • DT Dobie & Company (K) Ltd. Vs Joseph Mbana Muchina & Ano. [1982] KLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case