SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

REPUBLIC V ATTORNEY GENERAL & ANOTHER EX-PARTE HASSAN LOLO LOCHE [2012] KEHC 4232 (KLR)

[2012] KEHC 4232 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
4232
Citation
[2012] KEHC 4232 (KLR)
Decided
25 January 2012
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeMiscellaneous ApplicationPostureApplication for an order of committal to prison and for the applicant to purge his contempt by demolishing all the structures built after the court ordered that no further developments should be undertaken on Plot X3 located in Huruma Estate until further orders of this court.CoramW. K. KORIR
Holding

The applicant was not properly served with the court order and penal notice, and therefore cannot be committed for contempt of court. The orders issued by this court on 22nd February, 2011 remain in force and should be obeyed.

Facts

On 22nd February, 2011, Musinga, J issued orders to the effect that no further developments should continue on plot No X3 located at Huruma Estate pending the hearing of the Interested Party’s application dated 16th February, 2011. Thereafter, the 2nd Interested Party’s counsel extracted the order and served it together with a Penal Notice upon Hassan Lolo Loche’s advocate on record.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant was properly served with the court order and penal notice.
  2. Whether the applicant is guilty of contempt of court.

Reasoning

The court held that the applicant was not personally served with the court order and penal notice, and thus cannot be committed for contempt of court. The orders issued by the court remain in force and should be obeyed.

Outcome

The application is dismissed.

Orders

  • The cost of this application will be in the cause.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Civil Procedure Act
  • Civil Procedure Rules, 2010
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case