SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

RICARDO EPZ INTERNATIONAL COMPANY LTD v KENYA REVENUE AUTHORITY & another [2012] KEHC 517 (KLR)

[2012] KEHC 517 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
517
Citation
[2012] KEHC 517 (KLR)
Decided
11 December 2012
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeAdministrative LawPosturePetition and ApplicationCoramD.S. MAJAN
Holding

The court granted the application for urgent certification and joined the applicant as an interested party. The court ordered the KRA to allow the substitution of the consignee's name in the containers mentioned.

Facts

The petitioner, Ricardo EPZ International Company Ltd, sought to enforce its fundamental rights and freedoms, including the right to fair administrative action, after its Personal Identification Number (PIN) was disabled by the Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA). The KRA agreed to release certain containers pending payment of taxes and other charges, but the applicant, Hussein Ibrahim Nuni, sought to be joined as an interested party and have the consignee's name substituted.

Issues

  1. Right to fair administrative action
  2. Conservatory orders
  3. Substitution of consignee's name

Reasoning

The court found that the applicant's application was urgent and granted it, allowing the substitution of the consignee's name in the specified containers.

Outcome

The court granted the application for urgent certification and joined the applicant as an interested party. The court ordered the KRA to allow the substitution of the consignee's name in the specified containers.

Orders

  • Application for urgent certification granted
  • Applicant joined as an interested party
  • Order to allow substitution of consignee's name in specified containers

Remedies

  • Urgent certification of the application
  • Substitution of consignee's name in specified containers
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case