SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

PRUDENTIAL BUILDING SOCIETY (IN LIQUIDATION) v SIGAL INVESTMENTS LIMITED & 7 others [2012] KEHC 5349 (KLR)

[2012] KEHC 5349 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
5349
Citation
[2012] KEHC 5349 (KLR)
Decided
20 January 2012
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil SuitPostureMotion to dismiss for want of prosecutionCoramG.K. KIMONDO
Holding

The court dismisses the plaintiff's suit against the 1st, 3rd, and 5th defendants due to inordinate delay in taking out summonses to enter appearance and in taking any concrete step to prosecute the suit.

Facts

The plaintiff, Prudential Building Society, filed a civil suit against several defendants for breach of trust and failure of fiduciary duty. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss for want of prosecution, claiming the plaintiff had not taken steps to prosecute the matter. The plaintiff contested the motion, stating they had taken steps to prosecute the suit.

Issues

  1. Whether the plaintiff has taken steps to prosecute the suit
  2. Whether the delay in serving summons and prosecuting the suit is inordinate and inexcusable

Reasoning

The court found that the summons to enter appearance have never been served and have expired. The plaintiff's suit has not been fixed for hearing since the ruling of court of 1st April 2010. The delay is inexcusable and the court dismisses the suit.

Outcome

The plaintiff's suit against the 1st, 3rd, and 5th defendants is dismissed.

Orders

  • The plaintiff's suit against the 1st, 3rd, and 5th defendants is dismissed.

Authorities cited

Cases cited (4)
  • Mugo Njogu Vs Mary Githinji [2010] e KLR
  • Mukisa Biscuit Manufacturing Company Vs West End Distributors [1969] E.A. 696
  • Ivita Vs Kyumbu [1984] KLR 441
  • Allen Vs MC Alpine & Sons [1968] ALL E.R 543
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case