SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

MICHAEL MUTUA MUTUKU t/a SUNRISE SECONDARY SCHOOL v PHILIP MAKANGA c/o VICTORY FAITH MINISTRIES & another [2012] KEHC 5749 (KLR)

[2012] KEHC 5749 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
5749
Citation
[2012] KEHC 5749 (KLR)
Decided
30 July 2012
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil SuitPostureApplicant seeks a temporary injunction to restrain Respondents from interfering with the Applicant's management of the suit premises and to hand back the school pending the hearing and determination of the suit.CoramASIKE- MAKHANDIA
Holding

The court grants prayers (e) of the application, i.e., the temporary injunction to restrain the Respondents from interfering with the Applicant's management of the suit premises and to hand back the school pending the hearing and determination of the suit.

Facts

The Applicant, Michael Mutua Mutuku, opened a school for girls named Sunrise Girls High School on land previously occupied by Esther Girls Mission School. The land was leased to the Applicant by the 1st Respondent, Philip Makanga, who later took over the management of the school. The Applicant claims the 1st Respondent failed to execute a lease agreement, while the 1st Respondent claims he called on the Applicant to execute the lease without success.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant has established a prima facie case for a temporary injunction.
  2. Whether the court should grant the temporary injunction pending the hearing of the main suit.

Reasoning

The court finds that the Applicant has established a prima facie case and that failure to grant the injunction would cause irreparable injury to the Applicant's investments and reputation. The court grants the injunction to prevent the Respondents from interfering with the Applicant's management of the school.

Outcome

The court grants the temporary injunction.

Orders

  • Temporary injunction to restrain the Respondents from interfering with the Applicant's management of the suit premises and to hand back the school pending the hearing and determination of the suit.

Remedies

  • Temporary injunction
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case