SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

ERIC MOGIRE NYAKOGA & OTHERS v MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF NAKURU & 3 others [2012] KEHC 5764 (KLR)

[2012] KEHC 5764 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
5764
Citation
[2012] KEHC 5764 (KLR)
Decided
3 August 2012
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypePetitionPosturePetition for a declaration and ordersCoramW. OUKO
Holding

The petition raises a substantial question of law and is referred to the Chief Justice to empanel a bench of judges to hear the petition.

Facts

The petitioners are residents of Ronda Estate within the Nakuru Municipality. They claim the Municipal Council of Nakuru has failed to provide a proper drainage system, leading to waste of their land and health hazards.

Issues

  1. Responsibility for environmental impact assessment
  2. Proper drainage and waste disposal system

Reasoning

The petitioners have demonstrated that their properties are in danger due to poor drainage and waste disposal systems, posing a serious environmental risk.

Outcome

The petition is referred to the Chief Justice to empanel a bench of judges.

Orders

  • The petition is referred to the Chief Justice to empanel a bench of judges to hear the petition.
  • The 4th respondent (the National Environment Management Authority) is improperly joined in these proceedings and its prayers are dismissed with costs.

Authorities cited

Legislation (5)
  • Article 22 of the Constitution of the Republic of Kenya
  • Article 40, 42, 69, 70 of the Constitution of the Republic of Kenya
  • Article 12 of the International Covenant on Social Economic and Cultural Rights
  • Environmental Management and Coordination Act
  • Local Government Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case