SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

MICHAEL KIBOI GATUMIA v MASTERMIND TOBACCO (K) LIMITED [2012] KEHC 63 (KLR)

[2012] KEHC 63 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
63
Citation
[2012] KEHC 63 (KLR)
Decided
16 October 2012
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeEmployment DisputePostureClaimant vs RespondentCoramM. W. Mbaru
Holding

The court finds the termination of claimant's employment was wrongful and unfair. The claimant is entitled to one month salary in lieu of notice and nine months salary as compensation for unlawful loss of employment.

Facts

Claimant Michael Kiboi Gatumia was an employee of Mastermind Tobacco (K) Limited from 1994 to 2009. He was last employed as Manufacturing Manager and received a salary of Kshs. 203,300.00. He was deployed to Sudan for treatment and later moved to Nairobi for further treatment. His employment was terminated on medical grounds on 8th June 2009.

Issues

  1. Wrongful and unfair termination
  2. Reinstatement
  3. Salary in lieu of notice
  4. Damages for unlawful termination

Reasoning

The court notes the claimant's long service and the circumstances of his illness, but finds the termination was not justified as the employer did not follow the required procedures for termination.

Outcome

Claimant wins

Orders

  • One month salary in lieu of notice at Kshs. 203,300.00
  • Nine months salary as compensation for unlawful loss of employment amounting to Kshs. 1,829,700.00
  • Total Kshs. 3,862,700.00
  • Costs of the suit

Remedies

  • One month salary in lieu of notice
  • Nine months salary as compensation for unlawful loss of employment

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case