SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

MATIKO BOHOKO & ANOTHER V PRIME MINISTER AND MINISTER FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT & 2 OTHERS [2012] KEHC 879 (KLR)

[2012] KEHC 879 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
879
Citation
[2012] KEHC 879 (KLR)
Decided
8 November 2012
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeMiscellaneous Civil ApplicationPostureRespondents' Application for Certification of PetitionCoramMumbi Ngugi
Holding

The issues raised in the petition are not ripe for determination and are moot as the Bills are still being processed. The petition offends the principle of separation of powers.

Facts

Petitioners seek a declaration that proposed Devolved Government Bills would deny the Kuria Community fair, just, and equitable representation in the Migori County Assembly and request special seats for marginalized communities. They also seek a permanent injunction against presenting the Bills to Parliament until safeguards are put in place.

Issues

  1. Whether the issues raised in the petition are ripe for determination.
  2. Whether the petition raises substantial questions of law.
  3. Whether the issues raised are of a political nature and should be left to a political process.

Reasoning

The court determined that the issues raised are not ripe for determination and are moot, as the Bills are still being processed. The petition offends the principle of separation of powers.

Outcome

The petition is dismissed.

Orders

  • The file was forwarded to the Hon. the CJ for directions as to the hearing of the Petition.
  • The matter was placed before the Hon. the CJ for directions to be empanelled a bench of an uneven number of judges being not less than three.
  • The Petitioners were granted more time to file submissions, but have not done so to date.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Judicature Act Cap 8 Laws of Kenya
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010
Cases cited (1)
  • Muscrat –vs- United States (219 vs 346 (1911)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case