SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v Chairman Suneka Land Disputes Tribunal & 3 others Ex-parte Dominic Maangu Nyabwengi & another [2013] KEHC 1908 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 1908 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
1908
Citation
[2013] KEHC 1908 (KLR)
Decided
11 October 2013
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeJudicial ReviewPostureEx-parte application for certiorari and prohibitionCoramS. Okongo, J.
Holding

The 1st respondent had no jurisdiction to make the decision, and the decision was a nullity. The 3rd respondent had no jurisdiction to adopt the null decision as a judgment of the court. The application is granted, and the applicant is awarded costs.

Facts

The applicant, Dominic Maangu Nyabwengi, claimed that his deceased father, Peter Nyabwengi, had fraudulently registered the suit property in his name, depriving his brother, Samwel Omanwa Maangu, of the land. The Suneka Land Disputes Tribunal and the Land Registrar adopted the decision of the Chairman to cancel Nyabwengi's title.

Issues

  1. Jurisdiction of the 1st respondent to make the decision
  2. Validity of the decision of the 1st respondent
  3. Jurisdiction of the 3rd respondent to adopt the decision as a judgment of the court

Reasoning

The decision of the 1st respondent was a nullity due to lack of jurisdiction. The 3rd respondent had no authority to adopt a null decision as a judgment of the court. The suit property is registered in the name of a deceased person, so the order of prohibition is not granted.

Outcome

The application is granted, and the applicant is awarded costs.

Orders

  • Order of certiorari to quash the decisions of the 1st and 3rd respondents
  • Order of prohibition to prohibit the respondents from interfering with the suit property

Remedies

  • Award of costs to the applicant

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Land Disputes Tribunals Act, 1990
  • Civil Procedure Rules
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case