SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Amos Muriithi Kariamatu v Margaret Wambui Wamugunda & another [2013] KEHC 2160 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 2160 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
2160
Citation
[2013] KEHC 2160 (KLR)
Decided
26 September 2013
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLand DisputePostureApplication for Temporary InjunctionCoramA. OMBWAYO
Holding

The court finds that the plaintiff is the registered absolute proprietor of the land and that the defendants are in occupation of the land. The court grants a temporary injunction to prevent the defendants from cutting trees or committing acts of wastage pending the hearing of the suit.

Facts

The plaintiff claims to be the registered absolute proprietor of land known as Ruguru/Kiamariga/59. The 1st Defendant, Margaret Wambui Wamugunda, and her son, the 2nd Defendant, John Wachira Wamugunda, have been occupying the land since 1975. The plaintiff alleges that the defendants entered the land without his consent and are preventing him from enjoying the land.

Issues

  1. Whether the plaintiff is the registered absolute proprietor of the land
  2. Whether the defendants are in occupation of the land without the plaintiff's consent
  3. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a temporary injunction to prevent the defendants from cutting trees or committing acts of wastage

Reasoning

The court considers the plaintiff's claim as a registered absolute proprietor and the defendants' occupation of the land. The court determines that the defendants are in occupation and grants the injunction on the balance of convenience.

Outcome

The court grants a temporary injunction to prevent the defendants from cutting trees or committing acts of wastage pending the hearing of the suit.

Orders

  • The defendants are restricted from cutting trees or committing acts of wastage on the suit premises pending the hearing of the suit.
  • The defendants are to continue farming on the land

Remedies

  • Temporary injunction

Authorities cited

Cases cited (1)
  • Giella -V- Cassman Brown & Co. Ltd. 1973 EA 338
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case