SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Ashton Apparel (EPZ) Limited v Royal Garment Industries EPZ Limited [2013] KEHC 2302 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 2302 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
2302
Citation
[2013] KEHC 2302 (KLR)
Decided
20 September 2013
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureSummary Judgment Motion and Preliminary ObjectionCoramMARY KASANGO
Holding

The court dismissed the Plaintiff's summary judgment motion and granted the Defendant's preliminary objection. The court ordered the Plaintiff to file a valid verifying affidavit within 14 days or the case will be struck out.

Facts

The Plaintiff, Ashton Apparel (EPZ) Limited, claims US$86,000 from the Defendant, Royal Garment Industries EPZ Limited, for goods supplied in 2011. The Defendant filed a Memorandum of Appearance and raised objections to the Plaintiff's summary judgment application.

Issues

  1. Prematurity of the Plaintiff's summary judgment application
  2. Defendant's objection to the jurisdiction of the court
  3. Plaintiff's failure to provide a valid verifying affidavit

Reasoning

The court found the Plaintiff's statement of account insufficient and lacking supporting documents. The court also noted the Plaintiff's failure to provide a valid verifying affidavit.

Outcome

Summary Judgment Motion dismissed, Preliminary Objection granted

Orders

  • Plaintiff granted leave to file a valid verifying affidavit within 14 days
  • If Plaintiff fails to file the affidavit, the case will be struck out with costs to the Defendant
  • Defendant's Preliminary Objection is struck out with no costs

Remedies

  • Plaintiff granted leave to file a valid verifying affidavit
  • Defendant's Preliminary Objection is granted

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Civil Procedure Rules, 2010
Cases cited (1)
  • A. S. SHEIK TRANSPORTERS LTD & ANOTHER -VS- BARCLAYS BANK OF KENYA LTD & 3 OTHERS HCCC NO. 335 OF 2011
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case