SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v Manga Land Disputes Tribunal & 3 others [2013] KEHC 2332 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 2332 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
2332
Citation
[2013] KEHC 2332 (KLR)
Decided
30 August 2013
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeJudicial ReviewPostureApplication for CertiorariCoramS. Okongo, J.
Holding

The 1st respondent had no jurisdiction to entertain the claim, and its decision was null and void.

Facts

The applicant, Samwel Momanyi Sereti, claimed a share in his land, which was registered in his name. His sons, Gideon Mosoti Momanyi and Evans Momanyi Sereti, were aggrieved by the division of the land and the sale of a portion of it. The dispute was taken to clan elders but not resolved. The 1st respondent, Manga Land Disputes Tribunal, made a decision in favor of the sons.

Issues

  1. 1st respondent's jurisdiction
  2. applicant's right to dispose of land

Reasoning

The court found that the 1st respondent acted ultra vires its powers and that the proceedings and the determination were a nullity due to lack of jurisdiction.

Outcome

The application for certiorari is granted, and the 1st respondent's decision is quashed.

Orders

  • The 1st respondent's decision is quashed.
  • Each party shall bear its own costs of the application.

Remedies

  • Quashing of the 1st respondent's decision

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Land Disputes Tribunals Act, 1990 (Repealed)
  • Civil Procedure Rules
  • Environment and Land Court Act, 2011
Cases cited (2)
  • Desai-vs-Warsama (1967) E.A.351
  • Volume 9, Halsbury’s Laws of England, Page 351
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case