SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Daudi & 4 others v Kiringo Member of Parliament Igembe Central Constituency & 3 others (Petition 5 of 2013) [2013] KEHC 2353 (KLR) (27 August 2013) (Ruling)

[2013] KEHC 2353 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
2353
Citation
[2013] KEHC 2353 (KLR)
Decided
27 August 2013
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypePetitionPostureRespondents' preliminary point of lawCoramJA Makaau, Nyarangi
Holding

The court found that the 2nd to 4th respondents are parties to the proceedings and that the correct procedure was followed by the petitioners.

Facts

The petitioners filed a petition on May 22, 2013, alleging violations of their fundamental rights and freedoms under Articles 25 and 38 of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010, and the Constitution Constituencies Development Funds Act 2013. They sought declarations and an order prohibiting the publicizing of names of purportedly elected members of the Constituency Development Fund.

Issues

  1. Whether the 2nd to 4th respondents are parties to the proceedings
  2. Whether the correct procedure was followed by the petitioners as ordained by Section 49 of the Constituencies Development Fund Act, 2013
  3. Whether this court lacks jurisdiction to entertain the petitioners' petition
  4. Whether the petition is an abuse of the court process

Reasoning

The court noted that the petitioners' petition is mainly a complaint on the election of the respondents to Igembe Central Constituency Development Committee. The court also addressed the procedural issues and found that the petitioners followed the correct procedure.

Outcome

The petitioners' petition was dismissed.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010
  • Constituencies Development Funds Act 2013
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case