SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Philip Osore Ogutu v Michael Onyura Aringo & 2 others [2013] KEHC 2408 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 2408 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
2408
Citation
[2013] KEHC 2408 (KLR)
Decided
9 September 2013
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeElection PetitionPosturePetitioner's appeal from the declaration of the 1st Respondent as the validly elected Member of National Assembly for Butula ConstituencyCoramF. TUIYOTT
Holding

The Petition is dismissed with costs, and the total costs payable by the Petitioner to the Respondents are capped at Ksh.2,000,000/=. The costs will be shared equally between the 1st Respondent and the 2nd and 3rd Respondent.

Facts

The 1st Respondent, Michael Onyura Aringo, was declared the validly elected Member of National Assembly for Butula Constituency. The Petitioner, Philip Osore Ogutu, challenged the election, alleging violence, bribery, and irregularities in the election process.

Issues

  1. Whether there should be scrutiny and recount of the votes in the polling stations listed in paragraph 19 of the Petition.
  2. Whether there should be a declaration that the 1st Respondent was not validly declared as elected Member of the National Assembly for Butula Constituency.
  3. Who should pay for costs.

Reasoning

The Court found that the election was conducted substantially in compliance with the principles laid down in the Constitution and Election Law, and that the result reflected the will of the people of Butula Constituency.

Outcome

The Petition is dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • The total costs payable by the Petitioner to the Respondents are capped at Ksh.2,000,000/=. The costs will be shared equally between the 1st Respondent and the 2nd and 3rd Respondent.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case