SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Charity Wanjugu Kariuki Alias Charity Wanjugu Karoki v Festus Muigua Kariuki & another [2013] KEHC 2454 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 2454 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
2454
Citation
[2013] KEHC 2454 (KLR)
Decided
23 August 2013
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeSuccessionPosturePetitioner sought confirmation of grant of letters of administration, while Protestors opposed the distribution of the estate's only asset.CoramJ.K. SERGON
Holding

The grant is confirmed as prayed in the summons for confirmation of grant, and the Petitioner's proposed schedule of distribution is largely conforming with the provisions of Section 40 of the Law of Succession Act.

Facts

The deceased was a polygamous man and had children from multiple marriages. The Petitioner, a daughter of the deceased, sought to distribute the estate's only asset, L.R. No. Ruguru/Gachika/65, among her siblings. The Protestors opposed the distribution, claiming the Petitioner had received a share from the deceased's estate.

Issues

  1. Distribution of the deceased's estate's only asset
  2. Whether the Petitioner received a share inter vivos from the deceased

Reasoning

The court found that the deceased was a polygamous man and that the Petitioner and the Protestors, save for Winrose Wanjiru Kariuki, were all children of the deceased. The court confirmed the Petitioner's proposed distribution as it largely conforms with Section 40 of the Law of Succession Act.

Outcome

Grant confirmed

Orders

  • Grant of temporary letters of administration intestate on 4th January, 2011
  • Confirmation of the Petitioner's proposed distribution of the estate's only asset

Remedies

  • Confirmation of the Petitioner's proposed distribution of the estate's only asset

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Law of Succession Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case