SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v District Land Dispute Tribunal, Kabarnet & District Land Registrar Kabarnet & Charles Kandagor Ex-Parte African Inland Church (Aic) Registered Trustees, Kabasis (Miscellaneous Application 26 of 2008) [2013] KEHC 2468 (KLR) (21 June 2013) (Ruling)

[2013] KEHC 2468 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
2468
Citation
[2013] KEHC 2468 (KLR)
Decided
21 June 2013
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeJudicial ReviewPostureAppeal from a dismissal of a judicial review applicationCoramM. J. ANYARA EMUKULE
Holding

The court sets aside the dismissal of the judicial review application and reinstates the application dated 8.08.2007.

Facts

The African Inland Church (AIC) was granted leave to commence judicial review proceedings against the District Land Dispute Tribunal and the subsequent judgment. The application was dismissed by the High Court on November 30, 2010, but the AIC sought to set aside the dismissal and reinstate the application.

Issues

  1. Whether the dismissal of the judicial review application was valid
  2. Whether the ex parte Applicant's Notice of Motion was properly served

Reasoning

The court found that the dismissal was invalid due to the lack of proper notice to the counsel and that the application was not properly served. The court also found that the dismissal was not based on the correct legal grounds.

Outcome

The ex parte Applicant's Notice of Motion is set aside and the application is reinstated.

Orders

  • The ex parte Applicant will pay the Interested Party's costs to-date
  • The ex parte Applicant's Motion of 8.08.2007 will be heard within the next 120 days

Remedies

  • Reinstatement of the judicial review application

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Law Reform Act, Cap. 26, Laws of Kenya
  • Civil Procedure Act, Cap. 21
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case