SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

TOTEM SERVICE STATION LIMITED V THE ATTORNEY GENERAL [2013] KEHC 3080 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 3080 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
3080
Citation
[2013] KEHC 3080 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureAppeal from a judgment of the High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts) in Civil Case 417 of 2006.CoramNot explicitly named in the text, but implied to be the presiding judge(s) of the High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Holding

The court determined that the Defendant owes the Plaintiff the sum of Kshs. 9,249,212.20, and the Plaintiff is entitled to interest.

Facts

The Plaintiff, TOTEM Service Station Limited, claimed Kshs. 77,113,708 for fuel, petroleum products, and services supplied to the Defendant, The Attorney General, from 1996 to 2002. The Defendant denied owing the Plaintiff the sums claimed and stated that they never entered into a contract for the supply of fuel or petroleum products with the Plaintiff.

Issues

  1. Whether the Defendant owes the Plaintiff the sum of Kshs. 9,249,212.20, being the balance of the principal sum owed.
  2. Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to interest amounting to Kshs. 57,726,601.50

Reasoning

The court found that the Defendant acknowledged owing the Plaintiff the amount in a letter dated 20th February 2004, which was admitted by the Plaintiff. The court also considered the Defendant's subsequent partial payment and the Plaintiff's explanation of the changing prices per litre.

Outcome

The court upheld the Plaintiff's claim for the balance of Kshs. 9,249,212.20 and interest.

Orders

  • The Defendant is ordered to pay the Plaintiff the sum of Kshs. 9,249,212.20 and interest as determined by the court.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case