SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

REPUBLIC V ABDI IBRAHIM HAIDHER alias AGAWEIN [2013] KEHC 3568 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 3568 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
3568
Citation
[2013] KEHC 3568 (KLR)
Decided
30 April 2013
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCriminal CasePostureApplication for Bond/BailCoramS.N MUTUKU
Holding

The court allows the application and admits the applicant to bond and bail on the following conditions: execution of a bond of Kshs 1,500,000 with two sureties of similar amount each, or payment of cash bail of Kshs 1,000,000, and reporting to the DCIO Garissa once fortnightly until the case is heard and determined.

Facts

The applicant, ABDI IBRAHIM HAIDHER alias AGAWEIN, was arrested on 3rd April 2013 and charged with murder, a bailable offense under the Constitution of Kenya 2010.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant should be admitted to bond/bail pending hearing and determination of the case.
  2. What conditions should be set for the bond/bail if granted.

Reasoning

The court finds no reason to deny the accused person bail, considering the applicant's citizenship, residence, cooperation with the police, and the bailable nature of the offense under the Constitution of Kenya 2010.

Outcome

The applicant is admitted to bond and bail.

Orders

  • Execution of a bond of Kshs 1,500,000 with two sureties of similar amount each.
  • Payment of cash bail of Kshs 1,000,000.
  • Reporting to the DCIO Garissa once fortnightly until the case is heard and determined.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Constitution of Kenya 2010
Cases cited (3)
  • Joseph Mwenji v. Republic Nakuru High Court Criminal Case No. 112 of 2010
  • Republic v. Samuel Mwaura Eldoret High Court Criminal Case No. 25 of 2007
  • David Njuno Mbiyu v. Republic Nakuru High Court Misc. Criminal Application No. 86 of 2010
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case