SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

PICKWELL PROPERTIES LIMITED v KENYA COMMERCIAL BANK LIMITED [2013] KEHC 4383 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 4383 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
4383
Citation
[2013] KEHC 4383 (KLR)
Decided
20 March 2013
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeReal Estate DisputePostureAppeal from a judgment of the High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)CoramPresiding Judge
Holding

The Court held that the Plaintiff is entitled to retain the security deposit as the Defendant had not paid arrears of rent and had not vacated the premises.

Facts

The Plaintiff, Pickwell Properties Limited, is the registered proprietor of a building known as 'Shankardass House'. The Defendant, Kenya Commercial Bank Limited, entered into a tenancy agreement with the Plaintiff for the premises on the ground floor and mezzanine floor of the building. The agreement was for a term of 12 years, expiring on December 14, 2005. The Defendant did not vacate the premises upon the expiration of the tenancy and continued to pay rent. The Defendant later demanded the refund of the security deposit, but the Plaintiff refused, claiming the Defendant had not paid arrears of rent.

Issues

  1. Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to retain the security deposit paid by the Defendant
  2. Whether the Defendant is entitled to a refund or set-off for the sum of Kshs. 9,578,200.00

Reasoning

The Court found that the Defendant had not vacated the premises and had not paid arrears of rent, thus justifying the Plaintiff's retention of the security deposit.

Outcome

The Plaintiff is ordered to retain the security deposit of Kshs. 12,766,223.40.

Orders

  • The Plaintiff is ordered to retain the security deposit of Kshs. 12,766,223.40.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case