SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Ruth Njeri Zeyhle v Ebehard Zeyhle [2013] KEHC 6258 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 6258 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
6258
Citation
[2013] KEHC 6258 (KLR)
Decided
12 July 2013
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureAppeal from the High Court, Milimani DivisionCoramW.M. MUSYOKA
Holding

The applications are referred to the Deputy Registrar for hearing and determination.

Facts

Ruth Njeri Zeyhle and Eberhard Zeyhle are estranged spouses who agreed to liquidate their matrimonial assets and share the proceeds equally. Mr. Mathias Mboya Maitha, trading as M/s. Yambo Merchants and Auctioneers, claimed to have facilitated the sale of two properties (LR Nos. 14971/6 and 14971/9) and sought fees or commission. Both parties dispute Mr. Mboya's role in the sales.

Issues

  1. Whether evidence should be taken from Mr. Mboya regarding his alleged facilitation of the sales.
  2. Whether the Deputy Registrar should hear the taxation of the bill filed by Mr. Mboya.

Reasoning

The taxation of bills in the High Court is the responsibility of the Deputy Registrar. The Deputy Registrar should hear any issues related to the bill, including whether the auctioneer has the right to file the bill or whether the services rendered fell within the realm of the Auctioneers Act. The court does not have jurisdiction to determine these matters.

Outcome

The applications are referred to the Deputy Registrar.

Orders

  • The applications for determination are referred to the Deputy Registrar for hearing and determination.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Auctioneers Act
  • Married Women's Properties Act 1882
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.0 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case