SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Linmerx Holdings Limited & another v Mercy Nduta Keng’ara T/A Mwangi Keng’ara & Company Advocates [2013] KEHC 989 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 989 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
989
Citation
[2013] KEHC 989 (KLR)
Decided
19 November 2013
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil SuitPostureAppeal from an original trialCoramJ. B. HAVELOCK
Holding

The Court finds no agreement on fees between the parties regarding contentious business. The Court directs the Defendant to file 16 bills of costs for taxation purposes.

Facts

The Plaintiffs, Linmerx Holdings Limited and Upward Scale Investment Company Limited, brought an application under Section 47(1) of the Advocates Act against Mercy Nduta Keng’ara T/A Mwangi Keng’ara & Company Advocates regarding legal services provided for a transaction involving land reference number 209/309/1 (I.R. 92457). The Defendant demanded a deposit of Shs. 2,045,603.90 for the release of title deeds.

Issues

  1. Agreement on fees between the parties
  2. Remuneration under Section 45 of the Advocates Act

Reasoning

The Court notes that the Defendant was not involved in contentious business and that the fees dispute should be referred to the taxing officer. The Court directs the Defendant to file 16 bills of costs for taxation.

Outcome

The Court directs the Defendant to file 16 bills of costs for taxation purposes.

Orders

  • The Defendant is directed to file 16 bills of costs for taxation purposes

Remedies

  • The Defendant is directed to file 16 bills of costs for taxation purposes

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Advocates Act Chapter 16 of the Laws of Kenya
Cases cited (1)
  • In the Estates of Ogilvie: Ogilvie versus Massey (2) (1910) P. 243 at p. 245
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case