SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Josephine Wangui Ithondeka v Housing Finance Company Of Kenya [2014] KEHC 1471 (KLR)

[2014] KEHC 1471 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
1471
Citation
[2014] KEHC 1471 (KLR)
Decided
30 October 2014
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCommercial & AdmiraltyPostureApplication for Consent to ChargeCoramJ. KAMAU
Holding

The court dismissed the application as the purpose of the mortgage was not recognized by the Trust of Land Act and the beneficiary of the monies was not a shareholder or director of the company.

Facts

The applicant, Josephine Wangui Ithondeka, sought to charge her property to guarantee a loan for her family company, Visions Enterprises Limited. The company had two shareholders, Ithondeka and her son Dennis Brian Waweru. However, her daughter Wairimu Waweru was a minor and could not give her consent.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant could use the trust property as security for another person
  2. Whether the purpose of the mortgage was for the benefit of the beneficiaries for whom the land was held in trust for sale

Reasoning

The court ruled that the purpose of the mortgage was not recognized by the Trust of Land Act and the beneficiary of the monies was not a shareholder or director of the company. The court also noted that the purpose of the mortgage was to improve the company which would benefit all beneficiaries, but this was not a purpose recognized by the Trust of Land Act.

Outcome

Application dismissed

Orders

  • Application dismissed
  • No order as to costs

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Civil Procedure Act
  • Trustees Act Cap 167
  • Trust of Land Act Cap 290
Cases cited (1)
  • In Re: Eunice Wanjeri Njenga [2013] eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case