SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Co-operative Bank of Kenya Ltd v Mathews Okanya Odhiambo [2014] KEHC 1552 (KLR)

[2014] KEHC 1552 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
1552
Citation
[2014] KEHC 1552 (KLR)
Decided
21 October 2014
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from a judgment dismissing the appellant's claim for breach of contractCoramR. E. ABURILI
Holding

The respondent was liable to pay the appellant for the use of the credit card from 16th November 1995 to 16th November 1999, including interest and late payment charges.

Facts

The appellant Co-operative Bank of Kenya Ltd issued a credit card to the respondent Mathew Okanya Odhiambo. The respondent failed to make payments on the card, and the appellant sued for breach of contract. The respondent admitted issuing the card but claimed he had paid all due amounts after February 1998.

Issues

  1. Whether the respondent was liable to pay the appellant for the use of the credit card
  2. Whether the respondent had surrendered the card to the appellant

Reasoning

The court found that the respondent had not proven he had surrendered the card, and thus was liable for the use of the card. The respondent's claims about the bank's failure to stop usage of expired cards and permitting the use of the card without warning were not supported.

Outcome

The appeal was allowed, and the judgment and decree dismissing the appellant's suit were set aside. The appellant was ordered to pay the respondent the sum of Ksh. 178,040.83 with costs.

Orders

  • Allowing the appeal
  • Setting aside the judgment and decree dismissing the appellant's suit
  • Entering judgment in favour of the appellant for the sum of Ksh. 178,040.83

Remedies

  • Costs of the suit in the Subordinate Court
  • Costs of this appeal
  • Interest on the claimed sums at Court rates from date of filing suit until payment in full
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case