SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v Cherangany L.D.T & 2 others Ex-Parte Johana Nguriatukey [2014] KEHC 1736 (KLR)

[2014] KEHC 1736 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
1736
Citation
[2014] KEHC 1736 (KLR)
Decided
11 November 2014
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureEx-parte application for quashing a decision of the Land Disputes TribunalCoramJ. R. KARANJA
Holding

The application succeeds to the extent that the decision of the first Respondent (the tribunal) be and is hereby removed into this court and quashed accordingly. The ex-parte applicant shall be entitled to costs from the third Respondent only.

Facts

The ex-parte applicant, Johana Nguriatukey, applied to remove a decision of the Chepareria Land Disputes Tribunal, which was read and adopted as a judgment of the court, and to quash it. The tribunal had cancelled a title deed and given the land to one Chepkokai.

Issues

  1. Whether the tribunal had necessary jurisdiction to deal with a dispute involving registered land
  2. Whether the decision of the tribunal was made in the absence of necessary jurisdiction

Reasoning

The Land Disputes Tribunals Act defines their jurisdiction and powers, and disputes relating to registered land are not within their jurisdiction. The tribunal's decision was made without jurisdiction and is therefore null and void.

Outcome

The application is granted.

Orders

  • The decision of the first Respondent (the tribunal) is removed into this court and quashed.
  • The ex-parte applicant is entitled to costs from the third Respondent only.

Remedies

  • Quashing of the tribunal's decision

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Land Disputes Tribunals Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case