SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Muri Mwaniki & Wamiti Advocates v John Ngigi Nganga & another [2014] KEHC 2176 (KLR)

[2014] KEHC 2176 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
2176
Citation
[2014] KEHC 2176 (KLR)
Decided
29 October 2014
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeInterest and Costs on Advocate's BillPostureApplication for Judgment and Interest on CostsCoramF. GIKONYO
Holding

The court enters judgment for the applicant in the sum of Kshs. 127,320/- and orders interest to be charged on the sum of Kshs. 127,320 from expiration of one month from delivery of his bill to the client.

Facts

The applicant, Muri Mwaniki & Wamiti Advocates, applied for judgment for the sum of Kshs. 127,302/- in costs as certified by the Deputy Registrar. The respondent, John Ngigi Nganga & Ruth Muthoni Ngigi, was the client of the applicant.

Issues

  1. Whether the court should enter judgment in terms of the certificate of costs
  2. Whether the advocate is entitled to interest on his bill of costs
  3. Whether the advocate is entitled to costs on his bill of costs

Reasoning

The court follows the Advocates Act and case law to determine that interest is chargeable from the expiration of one month from delivery of the bill of costs by the advocate to the client but before the amount of the bill has been paid or tendered in full.

Outcome

Judgment for the applicant in the sum of Kshs. 127,320/- with interest and costs on the application.

Orders

  • Interest to be charged on the sum of Kshs. 127,320 from expiration of one month from delivery of his bill to the client.
  • Costs necessary to the application herein are ordered.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Advocates Act, Cap 16 of the Laws of Kenya
  • Civil Procedure Rules
Cases cited (3)
  • KAGWIMA KANG’ETHE & CO ADVOCATES v PENELOPE COMBOS & ANOTHER
  • London Scottish Benefit Society v Chorley and others (1881-85) All ER Rep 1111
  • Halsbury’s Laws of England
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case