SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Dominic Njagi Karong'o v Mathi Kairaria M'ranyu [2014] KEHC 272 (KLR)

[2014] KEHC 272 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
272
Citation
[2014] KEHC 272 (KLR)
Decided
16 October 2014
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLand DisputesPostureDirections on jurisdiction regarding appeals from Provincial Land Disputes Appeals CommitteesCoramB. N. Olao, Nyarangi
Holding

The High Court has no jurisdiction to hear appeals which had not been concluded by the defunct Provincial Appeals Committees. Such cases should not be referred to this court.

Facts

The case involves an appeal from the Eastern Provincial Appeals Committee at Embu regarding a decision from the District Tribunal. The appeals were not concluded by the Provincial Appeals Committee.

Issues

  1. Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to hear appeals from the defunct Provincial Appeals Committees on issues of law only.
  2. Whether the High Court can hear appeals from concluded appeals of Provincial Appeals Committees before they were abolished.

Reasoning

The court follows the principles stated in the case of 'The MV SS Lilian' and the Supreme Court's decision in Samuel Kamau Macharia & Another Vs Kenya Commercial Bank, which emphasize that a court's jurisdiction is limited to what is conferred by the Constitution or other written law.

Outcome

The High Court has jurisdiction to hear appeals against decisions in matters which had been concluded by the defunct Provincial Appeals Committees before they were abolished.

Orders

  • The High Court has no jurisdiction to hear appeals which had not been concluded by the defunct Provincial Appeals Committees.
  • Such cases should not be referred to this court.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Land Disputes Tribunals Act
Cases cited (1)
  • The MV SS Lilian
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case