SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Paul Njeru Mwathe v Vidya Thira Mwathe [2014] KEHC 3626 (KLR)

[2014] KEHC 3626 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
3626
Citation
[2014] KEHC 3626 (KLR)
Decided
18 July 2014
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureApplication to amend Originating SummonsCoramB.N. Olao
Holding

The application to amend the Originating Summons is allowed.

Facts

The plaintiff/applicant filed a home-made pleading seeking a declaration that the defendant/respondent holds L.R No. KYENI/MUFU/1189 in trust for him. Two years later, the plaintiff/applicant sought legal advice and filed an amended Originating Summons adding three other parties and seeking orders in adverse possession.

Issues

  1. Whether the application to amend the Originating Summons is merited.
  2. Whether the proposed amendment is necessary to bring out the real issues of the dispute.

Reasoning

The court allows the amendment as it is necessary to bring out the real issues of the dispute and the parties involved. The discretion to allow an amendment is wide and the court will consider whether the applicant is acting in good faith and if the amendment is necessary.

Outcome

The court grants the orders prayed in the plaintiff/applicant's Notice of Motion seeking to amend the Originating Summons.

Orders

  • The Amended Originating Summons be served upon the defendants within 14 days of this ruling being delivered.
  • The defendants be at liberty to file their replies within 15 days of service upon them of the Amended Originating Summons.

Remedies

  • The respondent shall have the costs of this application.

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Civil Procedure Rules
  • Order 8 Rule 3
  • Order 8 Rule 4
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case