SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Wekesa Kinisu & another v Fred Sinja [2014] KEHC 4954 (KLR)

[2014] KEHC 4954 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
4954
Citation
[2014] KEHC 4954 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil SuitPostureAppeal from the original trial outcomeCoramA. OMOLLO
Holding

The Plaintiffs are entitled to a permanent injunction restraining the Defendant from developing the suit plot until the dispute is resolved. The Defendant's only remedy is to demand a refund of his money from Edward Wekesa Kinisu.

Facts

The Plaintiffs are the sons of Kinisu Totolela, who died in 1999. The Defendant, Fred Sinja, built a 6-roomed building on a plot jointly owned by Totolela and Abraham Kanyanya. The Plaintiffs complained to the District Officer, who issued a letter asking the Defendant to stop building. The Defendant continued, leading to the Plaintiffs filing this suit.

Issues

  1. Whether the Plaintiffs' claim for a permanent injunction is valid.
  2. What remedy, if any, is available to the Defendant.

Reasoning

The Plaintiffs provided evidence that the Defendant built a building on the plot without permission, and the District Officer asked him to stop. The Defendant did not file a counter-claim, and the court found no remedy for him.

Outcome

The Plaintiffs' claim is upheld, and the Defendant is ordered to refund his money to Edward Wekesa Kinisu.

Orders

  • An order of permanent injunction restraining the Defendant from developing the suit plot until the dispute is resolved.
  • The Defendant is ordered to refund his money to Edward Wekesa Kinisu.

Remedies

  • Permanent injunction
  • Refund of money
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case