SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

National Agricultural Export Development Board v Cargill Kenya Limited [2014] KEHC 5294 (KLR)

[2014] KEHC 5294 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
5294
Citation
[2014] KEHC 5294 (KLR)
Decided
15 May 2014
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil ApplicationPostureRespondent seeks to set aside an Arbitral Award and seek costs and security for costs.CoramNyarangi
Holding

The Court dismissed the Claimant's motion to set aside the Arbitral Award.

Facts

The National Agricultural Export Development Board and Cargill Kenya Limited had a bailment agreement. The Respondent applied for security of costs before the Arbitrator, while the Claimant sought security for its claim and costs. The Arbitrator dismissed the Claimant's application and allowed the Respondent's application.

Issues

  1. Whether the Arbitral Award can be set aside.
  2. Jurisdiction of the Court in the Arbitration process.

Reasoning

The Court held that the issue of jurisdiction was not before it as the Arbitrator's Ruling left the critical issues for later determination. The Court also ruled that the Court's intervention is limited by the Arbitration Act.

Outcome

The Claimant's motion to set aside the Arbitral Award was dismissed.

Orders

  • The Claimant's motion to set aside the Arbitral Award was dismissed.
  • The costs herein and before the Arbitrator regarding the applications dated 8th June 2012 and 12th July 2012 were ordered to be paid by the Respondent.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Arbitration Act 1995 (as amended by the Arbitration (Amendment) Act No. 11 of 2009)
  • Section 10 of the Arbitration Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case