SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Musa Hassan Ali v Hannah Wairimu Gitau & another [2014] KEHC 572 (KLR)

[2014] KEHC 572 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
572
Citation
[2014] KEHC 572 (KLR)
Decided
21 November 2014
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureApplication for temporary injunction against evictionCoramL GACHERU
Holding

The court lacks jurisdiction to grant the injunction sought by the plaintiff, as the Business Premises Rent Tribunal has no authority to do so. The court grants the injunction but with a condition that the plaintiff gives an undertaking as to damages.

Facts

Musa Hassan Ali is a tenant of Hannah Wairimu Gitau's hotel premises since June 2010. He claims he was a protected tenant under the Landlord and Tenants Act and that he has invested heavily in the property. He alleges the defendants have unlawfully evicted him and are in the process of breaking into the hotel.

Issues

  1. Jurisdiction of the Business Premises Rent Tribunal
  2. Whether the court has jurisdiction to grant injunctions

Reasoning

The court holds that the Business Premises Rent Tribunal lacks jurisdiction to grant the injunction, and the court's jurisdiction is supreme. The court orders the rent to be deposited in court and the suit to be stayed pending the tribunal's decision.

Outcome

Application granted with condition

Orders

  • Temporary injunction granted
  • Rent to be deposited in court
  • Suit stayed pending tribunal's decision

Remedies

  • Damages undertaking

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Civil Procedure Rules
  • Landlord and Tenants (Shop, Hotels and Catering Establishments) Act
  • Environment and Land Court Act
Cases cited (1)
  • Giella v Cassman Brown Limited
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case