SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Captain J. N. Wafubwa v General Julius Karangi & 2 others [2014] KEHC 7346 (KLR)

[2014] KEHC 7346 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
7346
Citation
[2014] KEHC 7346 (KLR)
Decided
21 January 2014
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeMiscellaneous Civil ApplicationPostureApplicant seeks an order of mandamus compelling the Respondents to re-assess his compensation and terminal benefits.CoramG V ODUNGA
Holding

The court held that there is a legal duty imposed upon the Respondents to re-assess the applicant's compensation and terminal benefits under the laws that were used to remove him from office.

Facts

The applicant, Captain J. N. Wafubwa, sought re-assessment of his terminal benefits and compensation after the Court of Appeal set aside the initial assessment. He also petitioned the Prime Minister for intervention due to the Respondents' refusal to re-assess his benefits.

Issues

  1. Whether there is a legal duty imposed upon the Respondents to re-assess the applicant's compensation and terminal benefits.
  2. Whether there is a further duty imposed upon the Respondents to do so in consultation with the applicant to avoid unacceptable final figures.

Reasoning

The court applied the principles of judicial review and mandamus, stating that the duty arises from the Court of Appeal's decision and that mandamus can be issued where there is a specific legal right and no specific legal remedy for enforcing it.

Outcome

The court denied the application, stating that the applicant has not cleared his former unit and service in the Kenya Defence Forces, and thus cannot be heard to allege any default on the part of the Government and the Respondents.

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Chapter 199
  • Chapter 200
  • Pensions Act, Chapter 189
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case