SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Mureithi (Suing on his behalf and on behalf of the general public) v Attorney General & another (Petition 19 of 2014) [2014] KEHC 7650 (KLR) (Constitutional and Human Rights) (28 February 2014) (Judgment)

[2014] KEHC 7650 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
7650
Citation
[2014] KEHC 7650 (KLR)
Decided
28 February 2014
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeConstitutional ChallengePosturePetition for Judicial ReviewCoramLenaola, Mwilu
Holding

The Court has jurisdiction to hear the petition regarding the integrity of the Interested Party.

Facts

The petitioner challenges the constitutionality of the appointment of the Interested Party as the Chairman of the Athi Water Services Board, alleging that the 1st respondent failed to consider the provisions of Chapter 6 of the Constitution regarding the competence, suitability, and integrity of the Interested Party.

Issues

  1. Jurisdiction of the High Court
  2. Locus Standi of the Petitioner
  3. Obligation of the 1st Respondent to Consider Constitutional Provisions
  4. Reliefs to be Granted

Reasoning

The Court upholds the jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 165(3) of the Constitution, which grants the High Court unlimited original jurisdiction in criminal and civil matters, including the interpretation of the Constitution.

Outcome

The petition is allowed.

Authorities cited

Legislation (4)
  • Constitution of Kenya 2010
  • Water Act
  • Public Officers Ethics Act
  • Leadership and Integrity Act
Cases cited (2)
  • Samuel Kamau Macharia v. Kenya Commercial Bank and Two Others
  • Michael Wachira Nderitu & Others v. Mary Wambui Munene & Others
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case