SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Chan Chi Wei & 36 others v Directorate of Criminal Investigations & another [2014] KEHC 8543 (KLR)

[2014] KEHC 8543 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
8543
Citation
[2014] KEHC 8543 (KLR)
Decided
11 December 2014
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeBail ApplicationPostureAppeal from a trial court's denial of bailCoramL. KIMARU
Holding

The Applicants' application for bail pending trial is dismissed but with the proviso that they can file an appropriate application before this court if an adverse order is made against them by the trial court.

Facts

The Applicants were charged with offences under the Kenya Communication Authority Act and the Kenya Citizenship and Immigration Act. They were arrested after a fire incident in which a Chinese citizen died. Police found powerful communication equipment and drugs in their possession and discovered that most of the Applicants had arrived in Kenya on tourist visas that had expired.

Issues

  1. Whether the Applicants are entitled to bail pending trial under Article 49(1)(h) of the Constitution
  2. Whether there are compelling reasons to deny bail

Reasoning

The court found that the Applicants are entitled to bail pending trial, but there are compelling reasons to deny it due to the nature of the offences, the strength of the evidence, and the unique circumstances of being foreigners charged with unlawfully being present in Kenya.

Outcome

Application dismissed but with a proviso

Orders

  • The Applicants' application for bail pending trial is dismissed but with the proviso that they can file an appropriate application before this court if an adverse order is made against them by the trial court.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Kenya Communication Authority Act
  • Kenya Citizenship and Immigration Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.0 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case