SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Koome Mwambia & 3 other v Deshun Properties Company Limited & 4 others [2014] KEHC 8633 (KLR)

[2014] KEHC 8633 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
8633
Citation
[2014] KEHC 8633 (KLR)
Decided
10 November 2014
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLand DisputePosturePetition for Declaration and InjunctionsCoramL.N. GACHERU
Holding

The transfer is not illegal as the 1st Respondent has acquired a 99-year leasehold interest. The Petitioners' rights to a clean and healthy environment have not been violated.

Facts

Petitioners allege that Deshun Properties Company Limited transferred a freehold property to a non-citizen without adhering to constitutional restrictions. The transfer was challenged under various constitutional articles.

Issues

  1. Validity of the transfer of freehold property to a non-citizen
  2. Petitioners' rights to a clean and healthy environment
  3. Petitioners' rights to property
  4. Petitioners' rights to participate in development plans

Reasoning

The court found that the transfer was legal as it adhered to the constitutional restrictions on non-citizen ownership. The Petitioners' rights were not violated as they had not participated in the development plans through the required procedures.

Outcome

Petition dismissed

Orders

  • Declaration that the transfer is legal
  • Order to restore the building to its original condition within 60 days

Remedies

  • Mandatory injunction to restore the building
  • Order to enforce constitutional provisions

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Land Registration Act
  • Physical Planning Act
  • Environmental Management and Co-ordination Act, 1999
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case