SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v Makindu Principal Magistrate’s Court & 7 others Ex-Parte Justus Kimeu Suing as Registered Trustees of Jesus Celebration Centre & another [2015] KEHC 1176 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 1176 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
1176
Citation
[2015] KEHC 1176 (KLR)
Decided
16 November 2015
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeJudicial ReviewPostureApplication for Judicial Review of CertiorariCoramM. J. ANYARA EMUKULE
Holding

The court dismissed the ex parte Applicants' Notice of Motion dated and filed on 10th February, 2015, and ordered that each party shall bear its own costs.

Facts

The Plaintiffs in Makindu Principal Magistrates Court Case No. 392 of 2014 filed a suit against Pastor David Kavita Malonza, claiming he had breached the constitution of Redeemed Gospel Church by decamping with members of the church and attempting to transfer the church's property to another church. The Ex-parte Applicants, including Bishop Wilfred Lai, Bishop Charles Muoki, Bishop Mark Kegohhi, and Pastor David Kavita Malonza, moved the court to quash the proceedings in the Principal Magistrates Court.

Issues

  1. Whether the First Respondent (the Makindu Principal Magistrates Court) had jurisdiction to entertain the suit.
  2. Whether the Ex-parte Applicants have demonstrated that the magistrate lacked either statutory or pecuniary jurisdiction to entertain the suit.

Reasoning

The court held that the First Respondent had jurisdiction to entertain the suit, and the Ex-parte Applicants did not demonstrate that the magistrate lacked statutory or pecuniary jurisdiction. The court also ruled that the mere fact that the issues in the lower court were also pending in the High Court did not oust the jurisdiction of the lower court.

Outcome

The ex parte Applicants' Notice of Motion was dismissed.

Orders

  • The ex parte Applicants' Notice of Motion dated and filed on 10th February, 2015 is hereby dismissed.
  • Orders accordingly.

Remedies

  • Each party shall bear its own costs.

Authorities cited

Cases cited (3)
  • REPUBLIC vs. ISAAC THEURI GITHAE
  • REPUBLIC vs. PRINCIPAL MAGISTRATE'S COURT MURANG'A & 4 OTHERS EX-PARTE MILKA NYAMBURA WANDERI & ANOTHER [2013] eKLR
  • REPUBLIC vs. LIVERPOOL CORPORATION EX-PARTE LIVERPOOL TAXI FLEET OPERATORS ASSOCIATION [1972] 2 All ER 589
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case