SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Diocese of Meru Trustees Registred v Dennis Kimathi Kiogi & another [2015] KEHC 1247 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 1247 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
1247
Citation
[2015] KEHC 1247 (KLR)
Decided
19 October 2015
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLand DisputePostureAppeal from a consent orderCoramP. M. NJOROGE
Holding

The consent order is adopted as an order of the court.

Facts

The plaintiff, Diocese of Meru Trustees Registed, sought an order allowing the defendants, Dennis Kimathi Kiogi and Simon Maina Munene, 7 days to reply to a supplementary affidavit filed by the plaintiff. The plaintiff also sought for the defendants to submit written opposition within 10 days upon service of the reply. The defendants were also allowed to complete the roof at the second floor but not further until the application was decided.

Issues

  1. Defendants' reply to the supplementary affidavit
  2. Defendants' opposition to the application
  3. Completion of the roof at the second floor

Reasoning

The court adopted the consent order proposed by the parties, which allowed the defendants 7 days to reply to the supplementary affidavit, 10 days for the plaintiff to submit written support, 10 days for the defendants to submit opposition, and allowed the defendants to complete the roof at the second floor but not further until the application was decided.

Outcome

The consent order is adopted as an order of the court.

Orders

  • Defendants to reply to the supplementary affidavit within 7 days
  • Plaintiff to submit written support within 10 days
  • Defendants to submit opposition within 10 days upon service of the reply
  • Defendants to complete the roof at the second floor but not further until the application is decided
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.0 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case