SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Abuga Bichanga Misiani & David Mauti Nyameyio v Wilfred Nyambego Nyamboke [2015] KEHC 1264 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 1264 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
1264
Citation
[2015] KEHC 1264 (KLR)
Decided
11 November 2015
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeSuccessionPostureApplication for revocation of grant of letters of administrationCoramHON. W. OKWANY
Holding

The applicants have not satisfied the court that their application meets the threshold for revocation and/or annulment of the grant.

Facts

The respondent petitioned for a grant of letters of administration intestate in the estate of Orondo Misiani, deceased. The grant was confirmed, but the applicants filed an application for revocation under Section 76 of the Law of Succession Act. The applicants alleged fraud, concealment of material facts, and deliberate misrepresentation.

Issues

  1. Whether the grant was obtained by fraud, concealment of material facts, and deliberate misrepresentation.
  2. Ownership of the disputed land, South Mugirango/Nyataaro/617.

Reasoning

The court found that the applicants did not provide any document of proof to support their allegations of fraud and misrepresentation, and the actual ownership of the disputed land was not established.

Outcome

The application for revocation of the grant is dismissed with no orders as to costs.

Orders

  • Interim Orders of injunction to restrain the respondent from selling, disposing off and appropriating the assets of the deceased and specifically LR. No.South Mugirango/617 pending the hearing and determination of this application are vacated.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Law of Succession Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case