SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Molyn Credit Limited & 2 others v Inspector General of Police & 3 others [2015] KEHC 1297 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 1297 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
1297
Citation
[2015] KEHC 1297 (KLR)
Decided
13 November 2015
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypePetitionPostureRespondents opposed the petition.CoramMajanja, Nyamu, Warsame
Holding

The petitioners have not been arrested or prosecuted, but have been summoned to the Criminal Investigations Department. The court found that summoning them does not amount to a violation of their rights under Articles 27, 29, and 47.

Facts

The petitioners claim a civil dispute with the Office of the President, which led to their summons to the Criminal Investigations Department. They allege that the respondents violated their rights under Articles 27 and 47 of the Constitution.

Issues

  1. Whether the petitioners have demonstrated a violation or threat of violation of any of their rights under Articles 27 and 47 of the Constitution.
  2. Whether summoning the directors of the 1st petitioner, the 2nd and 3rd petitioner, in connection with the alleged overpayment, amounts to a violation of their rights under Articles 27, 29 and 47.

Reasoning

The court considered the pleadings and submissions, and found that the petitioners have not been arrested or prosecuted. The summoning of the directors does not amount to a violation of their rights under Articles 27, 29, and 47.

Outcome

The petitioners' claims were dismissed.

Authorities cited

Legislation (6)
  • Article 19
  • Article 20
  • Article 23
  • Article 27
  • Article 29
  • Article 47
Cases cited (3)
  • Isaac Ngugi vs Nairobi Hospital & 3 Others Petition No 407 of 2012
  • Rose Wangui Mambo and Others vs Limuru Country Club Petition No. 160 of 2013
  • Rosemary Wanja Mwagiru & 2 Others vs AG High Court Misc. Case No. 165 of 2011
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case