SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v Albert Wafula Wasike & another [2015] KEHC 1542 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 1542 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
1542
Citation
[2015] KEHC 1542 (KLR)
Decided
27 October 2015
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCriminalPostureAppeal from a decision admitting the applicants to bail pending hearingCoramALI-ARONI
Holding

The court admits the applicants to bond, releasing them on a bond of Kshs. One million (1,000,000) with one surety of a like sum.

Facts

The applicants were charged with murder, and both pleaded not guilty. A pre-bail report was prepared for both applicants, indicating that the 1st accused's family supported his release and indicated willingness to stand surety, while the community around him did not find him a flight risk. The 2nd accused was considered a habitual offender by the community, and his family feared he may harm the victims or interfere with witnesses. After the alleged crime, the 2nd accused's homes were torched by angry members of the community.

Issues

  1. Whether there are compelling reasons to continue holding the applicants
  2. Whether the applicants should be admitted to bail pending hearing

Reasoning

The court notes that bail/bond pending hearing is a constitutional right unless there are compelling reasons. The court observes that the ground was hostile, but things must have gone quiet by now. The court also notes that the pre-bail reports were prepared early, 2014, and that no details are given as to why the deceased family was apprehensive of the release of the 2nd accused and why the fear felt that he may interfere with witnesses.

Outcome

The applicants are admitted to bond.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Penal Code
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.0 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case