SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Priscilla Land Gates Ltd & another v Morris Gikonyo & another [2015] KEHC 1846 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 1846 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
1846
Citation
[2015] KEHC 1846 (KLR)
Decided
29 October 2015
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeMiscellaneous ApplicationPostureApplication for Leave to File Judicial ReviewCoramMajanja, Megarry, Nyamu, Oguk, Waki
Holding

The court grants leave to file a judicial review application and issues an order of prohibition to the 2nd Respondent prohibiting them from entertaining or hearing the matter in Rent Restriction Tribunal at Nairobi case number 707 of 2015.

Facts

On 8th September, 2015, the 1st interested party filed a suit before the 2nd respondent and simultaneously applied for an injunction against the applicants. The 2nd respondent denied the applicants' counsel audience to raise the issue of jurisdiction.

Issues

  1. Jurisdiction of the 2nd Respondent
  2. Denial of Justice
  3. Enforcement of Orders through Contempt Proceedings

Reasoning

The court considered the requirement for leave to file a judicial review application and the purpose of the leave to filter out frivolous applications. The court found that the applicants had an arguable case and that the 2nd Respondent lacked jurisdiction.

Outcome

Leave granted

Orders

  • Order of Prohibition to the 2nd Respondent
  • Stay of Proceedings

Remedies

  • Prohibition Order
  • Stay of Proceedings

Authorities cited

Cases cited (4)
  • Matiba vs. Attorney General Nairobi H.C. Misc. Application No. 790 of 1993
  • Republic vs. Land Disputes Tribunal Court Central Division and Another Ex Parte Nzioka [2006] 1 EA 321
  • Republic vs. County Council of Kwale & Another Ex Parte Kondo & 57 Others Mombasa HCMCA No. 384 of 1996
  • Re Bivac International SA (Bureau Veritas) [2005] 2 EA 43 (HCK)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case