SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Pius Mugo Njogu v Kirwere Njogu [2015] KEHC 1973 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 1973 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
1973
Citation
[2015] KEHC 1973 (KLR)
Decided
9 October 2015
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCustomary Land DisputePostureAppeal from a High Court judgmentCoramB.N. Olao
Holding

The defendant holds the parcel No. MWEA/TEBERE/B/1297 in trust for himself and the plaintiff. The caution placed on the suit land by the plaintiff is within the law.

Facts

The plaintiff and defendant are brothers of the late NJOGU MWANIKI. Their father was allocated two parcels of land, MWEA/TEBERE/B/4 and KABARE/NYANGATI/524. The defendant was registered as the proprietor of MWEA/TEBERE/B/4 to hold in trust for himself and the plaintiff. The plaintiff claims a portion of the land MWEA/TEBERE/B/1297, which he claims is a resultant subdivision of MWEA/TEBERE/B/4.

Issues

  1. Whether the defendant holds the parcel No. MWEA/TEBERE/B/1297 in trust for himself and the plaintiff.
  2. Whether the caution placed on the suit land by the plaintiff is lawful and should be lifted.

Reasoning

The evidence shows that the defendant was the eldest son and held the land in trust for himself and the plaintiff. The caution placed on the land by the plaintiff was within the law as the defendant had already abused his duties as a trustee.

Outcome

Judgment entered for the plaintiff against the defendant.

Orders

  • Vesting ownership of 3.295 Ha of the said land to the plaintiff.
  • Costs of this suit to be met by each party.

Authorities cited

Cases cited (2)
  • HENRY MWANGI VS CHARLES MWANGI C.A CIVIL APPEAL NO. 245 of 2004 NYERI
  • KANYI VS MUTHORA 1984 K.L.R 712
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case