SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Constantine Mwikamba Mghenyi v Institute of Certified Public Accountants of Kenya [2015] KEHC 2142 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 2142 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
2142
Citation
[2015] KEHC 2142 (KLR)
Decided
21 October 2015
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypePetitionPostureRespondent's application to wholly dismiss the PetitionCoramMumbi Ngugi
Holding

The Petition is dismissed, but the Petitioner is ordered to take steps to prosecute the Petition within the next three months.

Facts

Petitioner filed a petition and an application for conservatory orders on 12th May 2014. The conservatory orders sought were to restrain the Respondent from conducting elections of the Respondent’s council pending determination of the Petition. The Petitioner also sought orders declaring violations of his rights and an order for compensation.

Issues

  1. Whether the Petitioner demonstrated any violations of his rights under Article 47 of the Constitution
  2. Whether the court had jurisdiction to dismiss the Petition

Reasoning

The court dismissed the Petition because the Petitioner did not demonstrate any violations of his rights under Article 47 of the Constitution. The court also noted that the Petition had not been prosecuted since May 2014.

Outcome

Dismissed

Orders

  • The Petitioner is ordered to take steps to prosecute the Petition within the next three months
  • The Petition shall be dismissed in default of the Petitioner taking such steps

Remedies

  • None

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Article 47 of the Constitution
  • Evidence Act (Cap 80) Laws of Kenya
Cases cited (1)
  • Centre for Rights Education & Awareness & 7 Others –v- Attorney General [HCCP No. 16 of 2011]
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case