SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Josphat Gathee Kibuchi v Kirinyaga County Council [2015] KEHC 2392 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 2392 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
2392
Citation
[2015] KEHC 2392 (KLR)
Decided
23 September 2015
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureAmended application seeking to stay execution of decree and set aside warrant of arrestCoramF. MUCHEMI
Holding

The warrant of arrest against Joe N. Muriuki should be lifted, and the plaintiff should proceed with substitution and execution of the judgment

Facts

A warrant of arrest was issued against the County Secretary of Kirinyaga County Government, Joe N. Muriuki, in his capacity as defendant in a previous suit. The plaintiff, Joseph Gathee Kibuchi, seeks to lift the warrant and substitute the defendant.

Issues

  1. Whether the warrant of arrest against the County Secretary is valid
  2. Whether the plaintiff can proceed with substitution and execution of the judgment

Reasoning

The law governing execution against the government is under the Government Proceedings Act, which requires an order of mandamus for execution against the county government. The transitional authority must prepare and validate all existing assets and liabilities before claims can be made.

Outcome

The application is allowed

Orders

  • Warrant of arrest against Joe N. Muriuki lifted
  • Proceed with substitution and execution of the judgment

Remedies

  • Lift of warrant of arrest
  • Substitution of parties and execution of judgment

Authorities cited

Legislation (4)
  • Government Proceedings Act
  • Civil Procedure Rules 2010
  • Transition to Devolved Government Act
  • Urban Areas and City Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case