SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

John Ndungu v Michael W Ochieng (Civil Appeal 157 of 2009) [2015] KEHC 2425 (KLR) (1 October 2015) (Judgment)

[2015] KEHC 2425 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
2425
Citation
[2015] KEHC 2425 (KLR)
Decided
1 October 2015
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal on both facts and lawCoramGEORGE KANYI KIMONDO
Holding

The judgment and decree dated 11th February 2009 is set aside. Judgment on liability is entered at 100% in favour of the respondent against the appellant. General damages are assessed at Kshs 100,000. Special damages are awarded at Kshs 1,500. Costs and interest are awarded to the respondent.

Facts

The respondent was cycling when the appellant's vehicle, driven negligently or carelessly, knocked him down, causing severe injuries.

Issues

  1. liability
  2. quantum of damages

Reasoning

The appellant was found 100% liable for the accident. The award of Kshs 150,000 as general damages was considered too high and reduced to Kshs 100,000. Special damages were upheld.

Outcome

Appeal successful in part

Orders

  • Judgment on liability is entered at 100% in favour of the respondent against the appellant
  • General damages are assessed at Kshs 100,000
  • Special damages are awarded at Kshs 1,500
  • Costs and interest are awarded to the respondent

Remedies

  • Judgment on liability is entered at 100% in favour of the respondent against the appellant
  • General damages are assessed at Kshs 100,000
  • Special damages are awarded at Kshs 1,500
  • Costs and interest are awarded to the respondent

Authorities cited

Cases cited (3)
  • Peter Kahugu & another v Ongaro
  • Sokoro Saw Mills Limited v Grace Nduta Ndungu
  • Kampala City Council v Nakaye
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case