SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

David Kisiero Kiboi v Board of Governors Saboti Sec School & 2 others [2015] KEHC 2648 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 2648 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
2648
Citation
[2015] KEHC 2648 (KLR)
Decided
30 September 2015
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLand SuitPosturePlaintiff's claim for eviction and compensation against a public schoolCoramHonourable Court
Holding

The court orders the plaintiff to be compensated in monetary terms equivalent to 7.6 acres at prevailing market rates of land at Kitalale Settlement Scheme.

Facts

The plaintiff is the registered owner of land, which he gave to Saboti Secondary School. The school took possession of the land in 2002 and the plaintiff voluntarily surrendered it. The school was to be given a plot of 7.6 acres at Kitalale Settlement Scheme, but this plot was non-existent.

Issues

  1. Eviction of the school from the land
  2. Compensation for the land

Reasoning

The court finds that the plaintiff voluntarily surrendered the land to the school and deserves compensation. The school is a public institution benefiting the local community, and it is not fair to evict them from the land.

Outcome

The plaintiff is ordered to be compensated in monetary terms equivalent to 7.6 acres at prevailing market rates of land at Kitalale Settlement Scheme.

Orders

  • The plaintiff is ordered to be compensated in monetary terms equivalent to 7.6 acres at prevailing market rates of land at Kitalale Settlement Scheme.
  • The defendants shall pay costs of this suit to the plaintiff.

Remedies

  • Compensation in monetary terms equivalent to 7.6 acres at prevailing market rates of land at Kitalale Settlement Scheme.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case