Maurice Nabikliki Wata v Anna Nekesa Wanyonyi & 5 others [2015] KEHC 2708 (KLR)
- Court
- High Court of Kenya
- Case number
- 2708
- Citation
- [2015] KEHC 2708 (KLR)
- Decided
- 21 September 2015
AI Summary
Beta
Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureAppeal from a consent judgment, application to stay execution and review of consent judgmentCoramCW Meoli, KLR Muchelule, Odunga, Sitati
Holding
The application is struck out with costs to the respondents.
Facts
The plaintiff was awarded 2/3 costs in a consent judgment entered on 2.7.2014. The plaintiff's advocates, M/s Bulimo & Co., were replaced by M/s Amasakha & Co. The plaintiff now seeks a stay of the decree and costs.
Issues
- Representation of the plaintiff by new advocates
- Validity of the consent judgment
Reasoning
The court found that the new advocates did not seek leave to come on record and did not follow the laid down procedures. The application was filed without leave of the court and is therefore incompetent.
Outcome
Struck out with costs
Orders
- Application struck out
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Loading judgment…