SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kevin K Mwiti & others v Kenya School of Law & others [2015] KEHC 2788 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 2788 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
2788
Citation
[2015] KEHC 2788 (KLR)
Decided
29 September 2015
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeConstitutional PetitionPostureAppeal from the High Court of Kenya at NairobiCoramBANSRA, Braithwaite, Musinga
Holding

The Court holds that the applicants have surmounted the first hurdle and have proved they have a prima facie case warranting further investigation by the Court.

Facts

The applicants are law students who were admitted to their respective universities before the Kenya School of Law Act, 2012 was enacted. The Act established the Kenya School of Law and did not provide a transition period. The applicants claim they were subjected to differential treatment from their predecessors due to the promulgation of guidelines for admission to the Advocates Training Programme.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicants have established a prima facie case
  2. Whether the Respondents' actions are discriminatory and violate the Constitution

Reasoning

The Court considers the applicants' claim of discrimination and the Respondents' position that the guidelines were promulgated to avoid violating constitutional values and principles of equality and non-discrimination. The Court holds that the applicants have a prima facie case.

Outcome

The Court grants the conservatory order.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Kenya School of Law Act, 2012
Cases cited (4)
  • CORD Case
  • Centre for Rights, Education and Awareness (CREAW) & 7 others vs. The Hon. Attorney General, Nairobi HC Pet. No 16/2011
  • Muslims for Human Rights (MUHURI) & 2 others vs. The Attorney General & Judicial Service Commission, Mombasa HC Pet. No. 7 of 2011
  • V/D Berg Roses Kenya Limited & Another vs. Attorney General & 2 Others [2012]
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case