SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

National Housing Corporation v Resident Magistrate’s Court Mombasa & Municipal Council of Mombasa [2015] KEHC 3900 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 3900 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
3900
Citation
[2015] KEHC 3900 (KLR)
Decided
10 July 2015
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeJudicial ReviewPostureApplication for Judicial Review
Holding

The court found the NHC's case not based on illegality or impropriety of the decision to charge its officials. The court concluded the decision was so outrageous in defiance of logic that no sensible person could have reached it.

Facts

The National Housing Corporation (NHC) applied for a certiorari order to quash criminal proceedings against its officials in Mombasa Resident Magistrate's Court (RMCC) over Makande Estate. The NHC claimed it was not the proper party to maintain the disputed properties and that the RMCC's decision to charge its officials was irrational.

Issues

  1. Whether the NHC is the proper party to maintain the disputed properties.
  2. Whether the RMCC's decision to charge the NHC's officials was irrational and defies logic.

Reasoning

The court applied the Wednesbury principle, stating that a decision is quashable if it is so outrageous in defiance of logic or accepted moral standards that no sensible person could have reached it. The court found the NHC's case based on the principle that the decision was irrational.

Outcome

The court dismissed the application for certiorari and prohibition.

Orders

  • The court dismissed the application for certiorari and prohibition.
  • The court did not address the merits of the criminal proceedings.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Public Health Act
Cases cited (2)
  • ASSOCAITED PICTURE HOUSES VS. WEDNESBURY CORPORATION
  • REPUBLIC VS. JUDICIAL SERVICE COMMISSION OF KENYA ex parte Pareno
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case