SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Francis Edward Strange v State [2015] KEHC 4293 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 4293 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
4293
Citation
[2015] KEHC 4293 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeMiscellaneous ApplicationPostureApplication for variation of bond termsCoramHON. C.B. NAGILLAH
Holding

The court will reduce the cash bail to Ksh. 500,000 and allow the applicant to report to Criminal Investigation Department Headquarters, Nairobi every two weeks.

Facts

Francis Edward Strange, a 2nd accused in Criminal Case Number 48 of 2015, was granted bond with terms including providing two Kenyan sureties, paying a cash bail of Ksh. 1,000,000, depositing his passport, furnishing credible evidence of his place of residence, and reporting to the Criminal Investigation Office, Kilgoris Police Station, every two weeks. He now seeks to vary these terms.

Issues

  1. To reduce the cash bail from Ksh. 1,000,000 to an affordable level
  2. To drop the requirement for Civil Servants as sureties and substitute them with any Kenyan citizen willing to give sureties
  3. To allow the applicant to report to Criminal Investigation Department Headquarters, Nairobi instead of Kilgoris Police Station

Reasoning

The court considers the applicant a flight risk due to his non-citizen status and the fear of absconding. The right to bail is a constitutional right, and the court will accommodate the applicant's request to use ordinary Kenyan citizens as sureties and report to a more accessible location.

Outcome

The application is granted.

Orders

  • To provide two Kenyan sureties, not necessarily Civil Servants
  • To pay cash bail of Ksh. 500,000
  • To report to Criminal Investigation Department Headquarters every two weeks

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Article 49(i) (h) of the Constitution
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case